To answer the Stapler question, Mike Kelly referred me to this post where he had 144 tests. Yes, 144 tests, and, offhand, they look to be real, valid tests. To get there, Mike starts by looking up the manufacturer of the stapler, getting the specification, and seeing if the physical object conforms to the spec.
David Drake took a different tactic: He started with the Egg, and asked what purpose I wanted to use the Egg for.
A different way to say this would be “What are the requirements?” which is a solid way to start the discussion. For example, Mike could have tested the stapler to the Stanley Bostich Specification, but our requirements could be for a industrial-strength heavy duty stapler. In other words, we bought something Commercial, Off the Shelf that wasn’t fit for purpose.
That might not be quite fair to Mike, as I am sure he asked about fitness for purpose before starting his list – but I would be remiss if I did not mention it.
To do this at a conference, I would probably have a thin, pointed knife sitting next to a stack of envelopes, and say something like “Take your pick” between the egg, stapler, shalt shaker, and knife. When picking up the knife, by assumption is that more people would lick the envelopes and try to open them, and few would ask me what are the requirements.
At which point, I reveal that I’m looking for a butter knife.
You may say “No fair! That’s misleading!!”
To which I say, hey, it’s a simulation.
If some says that it’s an unrealistic simulation, I would ask:
‘Have you ever actually tried to build software in corporate America?’
More importantly, I think the response to the challenge is important. Both Mike and David Drake impressed me. I’ve seen a spectrum of answers and put them in general categories. More about that tomorrow.
PS: If you’ve got a conference and would like to see more of this thing, let me know. Otherwise, I’m thinking of setting up shop in the hallway at a few places next year …